Comments on: Type registering your own widgets in Ruby/GTK+ http://micke.hallendal.net/blog/type-registering-your-own-widgets-in-rubygtk/ Personal blog of Mikael Hallendal Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:51:19 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: Janne http://micke.hallendal.net/blog/type-registering-your-own-widgets-in-rubygtk/#comment-2322 Janne Sat, 19 Apr 2008 15:00:44 +0000 http://micke.hallendal.net/blog/type-registering-your-own-widgets-in-rubygtk/#comment-2322 I'm just basically confused as to why calling super is different from calling initialize; I thought super is just referring to the same method. I’m just basically confused as to why calling super is different from calling initialize; I thought super is just referring to the same method.

]]> By: Mikael Hallendal http://micke.hallendal.net/blog/type-registering-your-own-widgets-in-rubygtk/#comment-2321 Mikael Hallendal Fri, 18 Apr 2008 07:47:58 +0000 http://micke.hallendal.net/blog/type-registering-your-own-widgets-in-rubygtk/#comment-2321 Janne, GTK::Button class is type registered by GTK, rather than the bindings. I'm not sure if this makes a difference though. But in this case that would affect calling super from inside GTK::Button, rather than affect a subclass. Janne, GTK::Button class is type registered by GTK, rather than the bindings. I’m not sure if this makes a difference though.

But in this case that would affect calling super from inside GTK::Button, rather than affect a subclass.

]]> By: Janne http://micke.hallendal.net/blog/type-registering-your-own-widgets-in-rubygtk/#comment-2316 Janne Thu, 17 Apr 2008 08:38:05 +0000 http://micke.hallendal.net/blog/type-registering-your-own-widgets-in-rubygtk/#comment-2316 Hmm. Assuming the GTK::Button class is type registered as well, why is the parameter not a hash in the first place? Hmm. Assuming the GTK::Button class is type registered as well, why is the parameter not a hash in the first place?

]]>