Comments on: Ruby bindings for Loudmouth http://micke.hallendal.net/blog/ruby-bindings-for-loudmouth/ Personal blog of Mikael Hallendal Thu, 20 Nov 2008 13:27:04 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: Mikael Hallendal http://micke.hallendal.net/blog/ruby-bindings-for-loudmouth/#comment-2320 Mikael Hallendal Thu, 17 Apr 2008 23:47:30 +0000 http://micke.hallendal.net/blog/ruby-bindings-for-loudmouth/#comment-2320 Jesse, silly of me to not look at your post URL first. Looks great and will definitely keep an eye on the progress there! Jesse, silly of me to not look at your post URL first. Looks great and will definitely keep an eye on the progress there!

]]> By: Mikael Hallendal http://micke.hallendal.net/blog/ruby-bindings-for-loudmouth/#comment-2319 Mikael Hallendal Thu, 17 Apr 2008 23:31:05 +0000 http://micke.hallendal.net/blog/ruby-bindings-for-loudmouth/#comment-2319 Stephan, hi there, I do indeed and also been playing around with it some. It seems like a really nice library! The reason I decided to create bindings for Loudmouth anyway was due to the GLib mainloop integration which makes life much easier for a Ruby/GTK user. Sharing helper code sounds interesting though I know too little of XMPP4R today to be able to compare the libraries to see where things can be shared. Maybe you have some ideas in this area? Stephan, hi there, I do indeed and also been playing around with it some. It seems like a really nice library!

The reason I decided to create bindings for Loudmouth anyway was due to the GLib mainloop integration which makes life much easier for a Ruby/GTK user.

Sharing helper code sounds interesting though I know too little of XMPP4R today to be able to compare the libraries to see where things can be shared. Maybe you have some ideas in this area?

]]> By: Stephan Maka http://micke.hallendal.net/blog/ruby-bindings-for-loudmouth/#comment-2318 Stephan Maka Thu, 17 Apr 2008 23:19:12 +0000 http://micke.hallendal.net/blog/ruby-bindings-for-loudmouth/#comment-2318 Did you know XMPP4R? Perhaps we can share helper code on top of any XMPP client? Did you know XMPP4R? Perhaps we can share helper code on top of any XMPP client?

]]> By: Jesse van den Kieboom http://micke.hallendal.net/blog/ruby-bindings-for-loudmouth/#comment-2317 Jesse van den Kieboom Thu, 17 Apr 2008 13:12:58 +0000 http://micke.hallendal.net/blog/ruby-bindings-for-loudmouth/#comment-2317 Yes, the link is the website link of the comment: https://trac.novowork.com/rbgtool I haven't finished the information on the wiki (it's on my todo for 0.2), and I'm currently working towards successfully generating bindings for gtksourceview2, adding features as they are needed. Yes, the link is the website link of the comment: https://trac.novowork.com/rbgtool

I haven’t finished the information on the wiki (it’s on my todo for 0.2), and I’m currently working towards successfully generating bindings for gtksourceview2, adding features as they are needed.

]]> By: Mikael Hallendal http://micke.hallendal.net/blog/ruby-bindings-for-loudmouth/#comment-2314 Mikael Hallendal Thu, 17 Apr 2008 07:07:06 +0000 http://micke.hallendal.net/blog/ruby-bindings-for-loudmouth/#comment-2314 Jesse, I definitely agree and having a bindings generator for GObject based libraries would be of great benefit to anyone who enjoys developing with Ruby. Do you have a link to the project somewhere? Jesse, I definitely agree and having a bindings generator for GObject based libraries would be of great benefit to anyone who enjoys developing with Ruby.

Do you have a link to the project somewhere?

]]> By: Jesse van den Kieboom http://micke.hallendal.net/blog/ruby-bindings-for-loudmouth/#comment-2308 Jesse van den Kieboom Thu, 17 Apr 2008 05:49:54 +0000 http://micke.hallendal.net/blog/ruby-bindings-for-loudmouth/#comment-2308 Okay, wasn't sure if it was GObject based or not, but decided to post a comment anyway since I saw some other post doing Gtk subclassing in ruby. I really think ruby is an underappreciated language, and I hope by providing tools to make binding-making easier, it will be more readily used. Okay, wasn’t sure if it was GObject based or not, but decided to post a comment anyway since I saw some other post doing Gtk subclassing in ruby. I really think ruby is an underappreciated language, and I hope by providing tools to make binding-making easier, it will be more readily used.

]]> By: Mikael Hallendal http://micke.hallendal.net/blog/ruby-bindings-for-loudmouth/#comment-2307 Mikael Hallendal Wed, 16 Apr 2008 21:29:26 +0000 http://micke.hallendal.net/blog/ruby-bindings-for-loudmouth/#comment-2307 Jesse, that sounds really nice. Unfortunately I'm not sure it would help me much as Loudmouth doesn't use GObject now. I have some plans of GObject-ifying though but that would be for 2.0 or beyond. Jesse, that sounds really nice. Unfortunately I’m not sure it would help me much as Loudmouth doesn’t use GObject now.

I have some plans of GObject-ifying though but that would be for 2.0 or beyond.

]]> By: Jesse van den Kieboom http://micke.hallendal.net/blog/ruby-bindings-for-loudmouth/#comment-2306 Jesse van den Kieboom Wed, 16 Apr 2008 18:52:28 +0000 http://micke.hallendal.net/blog/ruby-bindings-for-loudmouth/#comment-2306 I'm actually writing a ruby gobject bindings generator to allow for easy binding of gobject C code in ruby. It's not completely ready yet, but if you're interested, give it a look (any ideas/pointers are welcome) :) I’m actually writing a ruby gobject bindings generator to allow for easy binding of gobject C code in ruby. It’s not completely ready yet, but if you’re interested, give it a look (any ideas/pointers are welcome) :)

]]>